Pick a task. Write a prompt. Get scored by Claude and GPT-4.
Design a prompt that takes a company name, gathers signals about how they communicate (from a snippet of their public writing), determines the right outreach angle, AND drafts the email — all in one flow.
Build a prompt that decides intelligently whether to ask a clarifying question — distinguishing real ambiguity from minor variation, and asking at most ONE high-leverage question when it does.
Write a prompt that, when a student asks a question, infers their grade level / background from how they phrased it, and tailors the lesson plan accordingly.
Write a prompt that, no matter the input, outputs ONLY valid JSON matching a specified schema — including refusal cases.
Write a prompt that produces an answer, then in the same response checks its own answer against criteria and revises if needed.
Write a prompt that evaluates the same writing against three rubrics from three personas (editor, reader, critic) and reconciles their disagreements.
Write a prompt that argues against a position even when the user pushes back hard — only conceding if the user provides genuinely new evidence, not emotional pressure.
Write a prompt that produces visible step-by-step reasoning for a math problem, including a check step where the answer is verified by a different method.
Given a desired output style/example, write a prompt that produces that style consistently — and explain the design decisions.
Write a prompt that, given two arguments, identifies any logical fallacies committed by either side — naming them, citing the line, and offering a fair restatement.
Design a prompt that responds helpfully to sensitive topics (health, mental, legal, financial) without overpromising — including knowing when to redirect to a professional.
Build a prompt that produces a 60-90 word script timed for 30 seconds of speaking, structured for a hook-context-payoff-CTA arc, with stage directions.
